ι›–η„Άζ©ŸθΊ«ζœ‰ε…§ε»Ίθ‡ͺε‹•εŠζ‰‹ε‹•ε°η„¦ηš„ιΈι …οΌŒδΈιŽθƒ½ε€ εΎžι‘θΊ«δΈŠεΏ«ι€Ÿηš„εˆ‡ζ›ι‚„ζ˜―ζœ€η›΄θ¦Ίηš„γ€‚. SEL70200G在70mmζ™‚ηš„ζœ€θΏ‘ε°η„¦θ·ι›’ζ˜―1ε…¬ε°ΊοΌŒδΈιŽεœ¨200mmζœ€ζœ›ι η«―ζ™‚θ‡ͺε‹•θˆ‡ζ‰‹ε‹•ε°η„¦ηš„ζœ€θΏ‘ε°η„¦θ·ι›’ζœƒζœ‰ζ‰€δΈεŒοΌŒεœ¨ζœ€ζœ›ι η«―η”¨θ‡ͺε‹•ε°η„¦ηš„ζœ€θΏ‘ε°η„¦θ·ι›’ζ˜―1.5ε…¬ε°ΊοΌŒθ‹₯ζ˜―εˆ‡ζ›εˆ°ζ‰‹ε‹•
The trade off is that with an f4 lens you will not get the bokeh for portraits that a faster lens would provide. For travel, would bring along a mid-range zoom, like a 24-70 f2.8, and or a fast prime lens anywhere from 85-135 mm. I had the original model 70-200 f4 and this is a huge improvement in terms of build quality and weight along with macro.
The new version of the lens has four XD linear autofocus motors. The Sony 70-200mm f2.8 GM OSS II had just a five percent miss rate with a toddler running straight at the camera. The older version
Sony FE 70-200 f/4 G OSS vs Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM II. Camera Sony A7. 100% crops from the top left corner – ISO 12333 professional chart. FL 100mm (approx.) Tags: Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS II, Nikon 70-200mm f/4G AF-S VR, Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS We did the 70-200mm f/2.8 lens MTF charts last week, so let’s do the f/4 versions of the same range now. Sports shooters and portrait photographers need that f/2.8 aperture, but many of us, most of the time, are willing to trade that off for smaller . 346 464 216 335 161 154 211 479

fe 70 200 f4 g oss